Having worked with Thomas’ assessments for a number of years, Chestertons approached the team to address the specific issue of increasing diversity and inclusion throughout the business.

Thomas’ psychologists devised a survey to investigate the differences in perceptions and experiences of different groups of people within the company. The aim was to understand sources of bias and identify approaches to reducing them in the recruitment and promotion processes.

Hiring managers introduced assessments at the point of interview in order to show statistical patterns over time of people being rejected or recruited based on gender, socio-economic background, age etc.

Alongside the Behaviour Assessment (PPA), candidates were sent a Qualtrics survey to complete outlining their demographic background. The aim was to identify at which stage of the  recruitment process they were being rejected, and then relate that to their demographic group.

As well as surveying prospective employees, 305 current staff completed the survey in November 2019; they were asked about perceptions of fairness, job satisfaction, commitment to Chestertons and intention to leave.

The results of the survey showed there was evidence of unconscious bias across gender and socio-economic factors and more extensive racial bias. Plus, the double jeopardy rule meant that anyone falling into two or more of these categories faced even more discrimination. The survey proved a need to introduce a more impartial method of filtering candidates and Thomas’ Behaviour  assessment (PPA) was chosen.

From the start, Thomas and Chestertons delivered unconscious bias awareness training to allow hiring managers to understand inherent biases in their decision making. Thomas’ experts also tabled some additional ideas to mitigate the issues.

They created an ideal PPA profile to match candidates against to add objectivity to the recruitment process. This enabled managers to think beyond their preferences and likes and their own experiences.

Chestertons re-ran the survey regularly and data showed there was a very large improvement in perceived discrimination and interpersonal justice through 2020; gender differences broadly  halved since 2019, and while there remained some differences in the experiences based on socioeconomic status, by 2020 these  were no longer existent for perceived discrimination or justice, and  reduced for job satisfaction.

The tools and training which made them aware of their bias allowed them to review processes, better support hiring managers and ultimately make more objective decisions in hiring.